Search found 4 matches
- Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:42 am
- Forum: Rfxcom Receivers & Transmitters Forum
- Topic: RFXTrx433 - Extremly poor reception from WT450H temp sensor
- Replies: 8
- Views: 20136
Re: RFXTrx433 - Extremly poor reception from WT450H temp sensor
Today I made a simple whip antenna with four radials ( I work as a R&D electronics engineer and had SMA-BNC adapter, coax cable etc. lying in my office. :), so I brought it home yesterday) The result was an additional 10m+wall for my Oregon sensor. Now it is placed inside my garage while the ant...
- Fri Sep 28, 2012 2:56 pm
- Forum: Rfxcom Receivers & Transmitters Forum
- Topic: RFXTrx433 - Extremly poor reception from WT450H temp sensor
- Replies: 8
- Views: 20136
Re: RFXTrx433 - Extremly poor reception from WT450H temp sensor
I have a Rubicson and Oregon temp sensor also. They are received from farther away, but maybe all of them should work from an even greater distance. The Oregon sensor did not work from just outside our house. Since my other weather station works perfectly from the other side of the garage I guess it...
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 1:07 pm
- Forum: Rfxcom Receivers & Transmitters Forum
- Topic: RFXTrx433 - Extremly poor reception from WT450H temp sensor
- Replies: 8
- Views: 20136
Re: RFXTrx433 - Extremly poor reception from WT450H temp sensor
Thank you for your reply. I will certainly try the antenna modification. Even if it is a cheap sensor a max distance 40cm is waay to short. There must be some other problem present as well.
Hakon
Hakon
- Thu Sep 27, 2012 10:19 am
- Forum: Rfxcom Receivers & Transmitters Forum
- Topic: RFXTrx433 - Extremly poor reception from WT450H temp sensor
- Replies: 8
- Views: 20136
RFXTrx433 - Extremly poor reception from WT450H temp sensor
Hello! Can someone confirm that WT450H (ESIC / Clas Ohlson) works ok with RFXTrx433 from more than 40cm distance? I have just bought and tested RFXTrx433 and several of NEXA's magnetic switches remote controls and motion sensors. Everything works at a range of 5-10m when tested. That is not true for...