mike7 wrote:thank you for your work & support. I have several issues and feature requests
Please report issues and feature request when you encounter them. Don't sit on them until just after I release a new version. Obviously the new version won't have features and fixes for bugs I don't know about.
mike7 wrote:I want to mention, "SR, UI pairs for ids 48 and 49" should be send after couple of minutes on gateway start/restart, otherwise they don't have effect. (it was tested on patched version, not on 4.1).
Unlikely. The code will do exactly the same thing if you give the commands immediately after a restart or several minutes later. The gateway will always request ID's 48 and 49 once for its own administration. But apart from that, the SR and UI commands do what they are supposed to do, irrespective of when they have been issued.
mike7 wrote:Thermostat connected/ disconnected mqtt messages from otmonitor have retain flag set. On start/restart gateway doesn't send "connected" message, so if you turn off gateway & restore connection, you will stay with "disconnected" in the queue (the error messages is different story, I will manually clear error after checking and correction) . I found the only way to check thermostat connection, it is checking for lack of T messages, is it possible to add command to firmware or otmonitor to check?
I will fix that in a future version of otmonitor.
mike7 wrote:Could you please suggest scheme or firmware change for setting gateway to "stand-alone mode" with still powering thermostat? The idea is to set thermostat to comfort mode, but control a boiler on eco mode with another algorithm, I don't need accurate control in such case. For several reasons I can't change my thermostat right now, it will be the solution for me.
You can control the domestic hot water enable option (comfort/eco mode) with the HW command independent of the presence of a thermostat.
mike7 wrote:Is it possible to add to firmware support for msg id 11 with read/write support?
There is already read support for TSP's. Write support would require a substantial amount of code. Given the limited code space still available in the PIC, I have no plans to add something big with what I consider low usefulness. If you want it, you are going to have to add it yourself.