Any one i need some advice wat VM to use.
Gr Ruud
Virtual OS
- Snelvuur
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 3156
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:01 pm
- Location: Netherlands
- Contact:
Virtual OS
I am about to go with ESX server, and nice part is.. its free.
// Erik (binkey.nl)
// Erik (binkey.nl)
Virtual OS
i.m planning to use virtualbox : http://www.virtualbox.org/
Virtual OS
i'm using VM server (the free version). Only con when related to the desktopversion is that only 1 snapshot is allowed, but it is legally free. Run's quite well if you refrain from disk fragmenting on the host.
Virtual OS
As far as I know ESX Server runs its own operating system. VMware server runs on a client Operating system. ESX server is very stable but VMware server is easier to install.
I'm using VMware server and am quit happy with the way it works. I also tried virtual box but in my opinion VMware is a better system!
I'm using VMware server and am quit happy with the way it works. I also tried virtual box but in my opinion VMware is a better system!
Virtual OS
I'm also using Vmware server.
Last week I converted the Homeseer machine to physical
The main reason was that I needed faster access to my nas box for the Itunes plugin.
The biggest problem in Vmware and all the other virtual OS software is slow I/O and slow network. +/- 50% slower that physical
In most application you will not notice that.
Itunes load in VM was 7 minutes on the physical machine 3 minutes
If you are using 100m network it will make no difference.
Also fast CPU machines will reduce the time.
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1">Enver
http://twitter.com/Chak64%20My%20Domoti ... dware.html<i> My Domotica Hardware Software</i></font id="size1">
Last week I converted the Homeseer machine to physical
The main reason was that I needed faster access to my nas box for the Itunes plugin.
The biggest problem in Vmware and all the other virtual OS software is slow I/O and slow network. +/- 50% slower that physical
In most application you will not notice that.
Itunes load in VM was 7 minutes on the physical machine 3 minutes
If you are using 100m network it will make no difference.
Also fast CPU machines will reduce the time.
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1">Enver
http://twitter.com/Chak64%20My%20Domoti ... dware.html<i> My Domotica Hardware Software</i></font id="size1">
Virtual OS
Enver: VM technology forces you to look different to specs. Otherwise it's a disaster after implementation.
Alexander
Alexander
Virtual OS
I'm using Windows Server 2008 with Hyper-V.
It's running 5 VMs; XP, Windows 2003, 2 converted (linux) VMWare appliances (vmdk2vhd) and another linux VM. This setup is running without any problems for more than 1 year now on a Intel E8200 CPU with 8 GB RAM and performs very good imo.
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1">Robert
http://www.hekkers.net <i>Digit's Online Home.</i></font id="size1">
It's running 5 VMs; XP, Windows 2003, 2 converted (linux) VMWare appliances (vmdk2vhd) and another linux VM. This setup is running without any problems for more than 1 year now on a Intel E8200 CPU with 8 GB RAM and performs very good imo.
<hr noshade size="1"><font size="1">Robert
http://www.hekkers.net <i>Digit's Online Home.</i></font id="size1">
-
- Member
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 7:00 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Virtual OS
If you run a recent Linux version on a processor with built-in virtualization support (as all recent Intel and AMD procs do), you can use KVM. It comes with the Linux kernel and can run any guest OS. Works very well.