Plans for 2009
Re: Plans for 2009
How are you planning to use them. In combination with a IMX10 or something else ?
Last edited by Alexander on Sat Jan 02, 2010 11:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: No need for quote
Reason: No need for quote
Re: Plans for 2009
One of the options to use them with Visnonic MCT302 not sure what else is needed..
other option is ask Carlo to add this to the new RFID project
other option is ask Carlo to add this to the new RFID project
Enver Tanriverdi | http://blog.tane.nl
Re: Plans for 2009
These options are both wireless. I don't trust it for 100 %. I was more thinking about putting an extra wire or using an IMX10, wich can work stand alone.
Re: Plans for 2009
Jos I think Visonic is more reliable than IMX10.
We need a some kind of interface before the connection is possible to the IMX10 or Visnoic.
We need a some kind of interface before the connection is possible to the IMX10 or Visnoic.
Enver Tanriverdi | http://blog.tane.nl
Re: Plans for 2009
In combination with, yes here it is again, an Arduino or something compatibleLempens wrote:How are you planning to use them. In combination with a IMX10 or something else ?
Main reason is to add some local 'intelligence' otherwise the sensor will probably create a lot of traffic.
See also http://blog.hekkers.net/2009/10/07/ardu ... on-sensor/, although that is a different kind of sensor.
Re: Plans for 2009
The interface is no problem only the powersuply. You can almost connect the out pin directly to an IMX10. You need to suply 5v to it for the AMN.TANE wrote:Jos I think Visonic is more reliable than IMX10.
We need a some kind of interface before the connection is possible to the IMX10 or Visnoic.
When you use an Relais, you can use the second wire of an SAIX15 for the lights to go ON and OFF, and use the normal switch.
Maybee someone knows of the is something
I have several Wiznet moduls, the have an Ehternet connection, I can use the in combination with the IMX10 or SAIX15, So you can control the unit by internet, settings te delay etc.DIGIT wrote: In combination with, yes here it is again, an Arduino or something compatible
Main reason is to add some local 'intelligence' otherwise the sensor would create a lot of traffic.