Accuracy of the energy measurement
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2009 4:56 pm
The reported energy on the source display as actueel gebruik is presented with two digits behind the decimal point/comma suggusting it is accurate as 1/100 th of a watt ...... it is misleading as an acutal reading.
If you increase the energy consumption you will see fixed values of the actual consumption like 1,80 - 3,94 - 6,08 - 8,22 - 10,35 Watt the source software is receiving a digital value in units of about 2,14W. It should make sense and using 2048 units to cover 16AmpX230V = 3680Watt range.
In case you measure a standby energy consumption of a device at 10,35 Watt (5 units) the real value may range from 8 till 12 Watt so the accuracy is about +/- 20%. Not in line with the 5% accuracy reporting
May be the circle is keeping a beter cumulative accuracy by changing the transmitted digits like for a bunch of 5 units followed by a 4 unit reading.
Would like to have some explanation of the reported accuracy ... special the reported 1% with +/- 0,2W (cumulative) and 5% +/- 0,5W on actual reading.
H.
If you increase the energy consumption you will see fixed values of the actual consumption like 1,80 - 3,94 - 6,08 - 8,22 - 10,35 Watt the source software is receiving a digital value in units of about 2,14W. It should make sense and using 2048 units to cover 16AmpX230V = 3680Watt range.
In case you measure a standby energy consumption of a device at 10,35 Watt (5 units) the real value may range from 8 till 12 Watt so the accuracy is about +/- 20%. Not in line with the 5% accuracy reporting
May be the circle is keeping a beter cumulative accuracy by changing the transmitted digits like for a bunch of 5 units followed by a 4 unit reading.
Would like to have some explanation of the reported accuracy ... special the reported 1% with +/- 0,2W (cumulative) and 5% +/- 0,5W on actual reading.
H.