Anybody using a SFX40 filter?
Posted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:09 pm
If 'yes', how is it working for you?
I'm having my fuse box replaced next week, and getting in that SFX40 filter that's been laying around here the past 7 years may be a bit harder than expected; All my extra wishes are making it a real tight fit. I've been doing fine without it for 7 years, but I would have felt better during these years if it were installed. Now to determine if it actually makes a difference, I have attached it to my signal analyzer and I came to the rather shocking measurement below: This diagram shows a the spectrum of the SFX40 filter under test. The left-hand side represents 12kHz, the right-hand side 1.2MHz, everything in between is scaled logarithmically. The green trace represents the input signal to the filter, the yellow trace the output signal from the filter. The red vertical line indicates 120kHz, where the X10 carrier signal is. The difference between the green and yellow line show the actual attenuation of the filter at the given frequency. I have put markers on both traces and the difference in printed in yellow: At 120kHz the SFX40 filter attenuates an underwhelming -0.24dB. That's waaaay too little (I feel the need to add more a's here, but I won't) to be of any use.
But at 2kHz and further, the output signal takes a dive, so I figured I'd see where it goes: I have to give it to them: It goes deep. Impressively deep even. But at 5.030MHz a whopping attenuation of -22.08dB is completely useless to block X10 signals at 120kHz.
I wonder how much engineering and testing went into this filter. Perhaps it's not possible to design a filter capable of handling 40Ampere that blocks 120kHz at a decent rate without introducing huge amounts of 'blind current'. But it is useless the way it is now, and a simple test would have proven that during development already. So I really wonder why it's on the market.
I'm having my fuse box replaced next week, and getting in that SFX40 filter that's been laying around here the past 7 years may be a bit harder than expected; All my extra wishes are making it a real tight fit. I've been doing fine without it for 7 years, but I would have felt better during these years if it were installed. Now to determine if it actually makes a difference, I have attached it to my signal analyzer and I came to the rather shocking measurement below: This diagram shows a the spectrum of the SFX40 filter under test. The left-hand side represents 12kHz, the right-hand side 1.2MHz, everything in between is scaled logarithmically. The green trace represents the input signal to the filter, the yellow trace the output signal from the filter. The red vertical line indicates 120kHz, where the X10 carrier signal is. The difference between the green and yellow line show the actual attenuation of the filter at the given frequency. I have put markers on both traces and the difference in printed in yellow: At 120kHz the SFX40 filter attenuates an underwhelming -0.24dB. That's waaaay too little (I feel the need to add more a's here, but I won't) to be of any use.
But at 2kHz and further, the output signal takes a dive, so I figured I'd see where it goes: I have to give it to them: It goes deep. Impressively deep even. But at 5.030MHz a whopping attenuation of -22.08dB is completely useless to block X10 signals at 120kHz.
I wonder how much engineering and testing went into this filter. Perhaps it's not possible to design a filter capable of handling 40Ampere that blocks 120kHz at a decent rate without introducing huge amounts of 'blind current'. But it is useless the way it is now, and a simple test would have proven that during development already. So I really wonder why it's on the market.