Hi,
I'm getting very frustrated about my outdoor oregon scientific sensors. I have been using them for many years but I have to replace them every 2-3 years now my WTGR800 has died because of weather influences (how strange) but I had about 5 broken water sensors (THWR800) and also 2 or 3 UV sensors. The WTGR800 cost me 119 euro and I would expect a longer lifetime.
The be honest, I've had it with Oregon Scientific.
What are my alternatives for outdoor rain, wind, temperature, humidity and water sensors in combination with Homeseer....
Thank you,
Rien
Oregon Scientific frustration
Moderator: b_weijenberg
- b_weijenberg
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:32 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Oregon Scientific frustration
The RFXCOM plug-in with the RFXtrx433 supports also:
TFA, Cresta and laCrosse, see chapter 2.2.1 http://rfxcom.com/Documents/RFXtrx%20User%20Guide.pdf
TFA, Cresta and laCrosse, see chapter 2.2.1 http://rfxcom.com/Documents/RFXtrx%20User%20Guide.pdf
Re: Oregon Scientific frustration
Bedankt Bert,
Which of the 3 is the most reliable and durable. What are youre experiances in general
Gr,
Rien
Which of the 3 is the most reliable and durable. What are youre experiances in general
Gr,
Rien
Last edited by Bwired on Sat May 31, 2014 10:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Translated by google
Reason: Translated by google
Rien
-
- Starting Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:01 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Oregon Scientific frustration
Hi Bert,b_weijenberg wrote:The RFXCOM plug-in with the RFXtrx433 supports also:
TFA, Cresta and laCrosse, see chapter 2.2.1 http://rfxcom.com/Documents/RFXtrx%20User%20Guide.pdf
Would the RFXCOM 433 receiver also be capable to receive signals from these devices ?
I'm facing similar issues with Oregon sensors. Over the past couple of years I've already sacrificed two THGR122NX sensors. They're mounted in a shielded box keeping them dry from direct rain. It seems like these devices don't cope very well with humid conditions. I would like to replace the outdoor devices with the ones mentioned above.
Thanks
- b_weijenberg
- Forum Moderator
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Sun May 14, 2006 4:32 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Oregon Scientific frustration
RFXLAN and USB receivers can receive Oregon sensors.
The RFXtrx433 can receive some other sensors.
See also this page http://www.rfxcom.com/oregon.htm
Maybe a good idea to protect the internal electronics of the sensors with:
http://www.conrad.nl/ce/nl/product/8841 ... archDetail
(do not spray this on the humidity sensor)
The RFXtrx433 can receive some other sensors.
See also this page http://www.rfxcom.com/oregon.htm
Maybe a good idea to protect the internal electronics of the sensors with:
http://www.conrad.nl/ce/nl/product/8841 ... archDetail
(do not spray this on the humidity sensor)
-
- Starting Member
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:01 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Oregon Scientific frustration
Thanks.
In a last effort attempt I've sprayed the internals of the sensor with silicone spray a while ago, working fine so far . . .
In a last effort attempt I've sprayed the internals of the sensor with silicone spray a while ago, working fine so far . . .
Re: Oregon Scientific frustration
I have a couple of TFA 5-channel sensors and they prove to be very reliable and long lasting on a set of batteries.
Nico - Domotica in de Betuwe
Re: Oregon Scientific frustration
hmmm, maybe I am lucky, but my sensors are surviving quite well over several years already, even though we had -15 C a few months ago and are not at +35 C, and for instance the water-collector was covered in 50cm of snow till I wrapped it inside a heating-cable typically used for terrariums 
As for durability, and I am not sure that they are supported by rfxcom, the Davis stuff (http://www.ambientweather.com/wunderbridge.html) is very resilient.

As for durability, and I am not sure that they are supported by rfxcom, the Davis stuff (http://www.ambientweather.com/wunderbridge.html) is very resilient.